Three new analysis passes in scripts/recalibrate_algo.py that match the
scoring factors landed in commit 86364f4:
* NEXRAD composite reflectivity vs distance per band — checks that the
Marshall-Palmer rain rate in Scorer.dbz_to_rain_rate_mmhr/1 moves the
needle in the expected direction at 24+ GHz.
* hrrr_native_profiles.best_duct_band_ghz vs distance per band —
validates the 1.15× boost in Scorer.score_refractivity/4. Current
corpus shows essentially zero contacts with a native duct supporting
≥5 GHz at the target band, consistent with the 0.12% rate in Part 2c;
the boost is physics-correct but almost never fires today.
* Commercial-link rx_power degradation vs contemporaneous DFW contacts —
pearson + binned distance. Empty today because commercial_samples only
covers Mar 30–Apr 13 and contests don't overlap. Scaffolding is in
place so the moment contest-season overlap exists, the signal shows.
Report rebuilt at docs/algo-reports/2026-04-13-recalibration.md.
Graham McIntire
5af4142e28