Cache MixUnused analyzer state to skip repeated BEAM scans in tests

- Split Analyzer.analyze/1 into compute_state/1 (slow, scans all BEAMs)
  and a fast filter step. analyze/1 now accepts :precomputed_state opt.
- Mix.Tasks.Compile.Unused.run/1 picks up precomputed state from process
  dict :mix_unused_extra_analyze_opts when present (test escape hatch).
- AnalyzerTest setup_all computes state once; exclude tests pass it
  through analyze/1, dropping per-test cost from ~700ms to <1ms.
- UnusedTest setup_all does the same — the consolidated severity-args
  test drops from 3.4s to ~5ms.
- Trim further sleeps in HistoricalLoadingTest (100->30ms) and
  MovementTest (50->20ms, receive timeouts 100->30ms).

Total suite: 40.6s -> 37.7s; 2488 tests, 0 failures.

lib/mix/tasks/compile/unused.ex

@@ -69,8 +69,13 @@ defmodule Mix.Tasks.Compile.Unused do
     # Make sure the project is compiled before analyzing.
     _ = Mix.Task.run("compile", [])
 
+    # Tests may stash a precomputed Analyzer state in the process dict to
+    # avoid scanning all BEAM files on every Unused.run/1 call.
+    extra_analyze_opts = Process.get(:mix_unused_extra_analyze_opts, [])
+
     config
     |> filter_options()
+    |> Keyword.merge(extra_analyze_opts)
     |> Analyzer.analyze()
     |> filter_test_files(Keyword.get(config, :ignore_test_files, true))
     |> emit(severity)

lib/mix_unused/analyzer.ex

@@ -32,10 +32,18 @@ defmodule MixUnused.Analyzer do
   """
   @spec analyze(keyword()) :: [unused_entry()]
   def analyze(opts \\ []) do
-    excluded = Keyword.get(opts, :exclude, [])
+    state = Keyword.get_lazy(opts, :precomputed_state, fn -> compute_state(opts) end)
-    excluded_modules = MapSet.new(for m <- excluded, is_atom(m), do: m)
+    filter_state(state, opts)
-    excluded_mfas = MapSet.new(for {m, f, a} <- excluded, do: {m, f, a})
+  end
 
+  @doc """
+  Computes the heavy parts of analysis (project modules, defs, calls) once.
+  Pass the result back into `analyze/1` via the `:precomputed_state` option to
+  amortize this cost across multiple `analyze` calls (e.g. in tests that
+  re-run analysis with different `:exclude` filters).
+  """
+  @spec compute_state(keyword()) :: map()
+  def compute_state(opts \\ []) do
     compile_path =
       Keyword.get_lazy(opts, :compile_path, fn -> Mix.Project.compile_path() end)
 
@@ -44,8 +52,17 @@ defmodule MixUnused.Analyzer do
     project_modules = collect_project_modules(compile_path, app)
     project_module_set = MapSet.new(project_modules)
 
-    defs = collect_definitions(project_modules)
+    %{
-    calls = collect_calls(project_modules)
+      defs: collect_definitions(project_modules),
+      calls: collect_calls(project_modules),
+      project_module_set: project_module_set
+    }
+  end
+
+  defp filter_state(%{defs: defs, calls: calls, project_module_set: project_module_set}, opts) do
+    excluded = Keyword.get(opts, :exclude, [])
+    excluded_modules = MapSet.new(for m <- excluded, is_atom(m), do: m)
+    excluded_mfas = MapSet.new(for {m, f, a} <- excluded, do: {m, f, a})
 
     defs
     |> Enum.reject(fn {{m, f, a}, _meta} ->

test/aprsme_web/live/map_live/historical_loading_test.exs

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.HistoricalLoadingTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", %{"bounds" => bounds})
 
       # Wait for historical loading to process
-      Process.sleep(100)
+      Process.sleep(30)
 
       # The view should have pushed events to add the historical packets
       # We can verify by checking that the packets were queried from the database
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.HistoricalLoadingTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", %{"bounds" => bounds})
 
       # Wait for historical loading
-      Process.sleep(100)
+      Process.sleep(30)
 
       # Verify the old packet would be included with 6-hour window
       recent_packets =
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.HistoricalLoadingTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", %{"bounds" => bounds})
 
       # Wait for historical loading
-      Process.sleep(100)
+      Process.sleep(30)
 
       # Both packets should be loaded since they're in the bounds
       recent_packets =
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.HistoricalLoadingTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", %{"bounds" => invalid_bounds})
 
       # Wait briefly
-      Process.sleep(100)
+      Process.sleep(30)
 
       # Since we can't check internal state, we verify the view is still functional
       # by sending valid bounds and checking it still works
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.HistoricalLoadingTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", %{"bounds" => bounds})
 
       # Allow time for progressive loading batches
-      Process.sleep(100)
+      Process.sleep(30)
 
       # The loading should have completed in multiple batches
       # This tests that the progressive loading mechanism works

test/aprsme_web/live/map_live/movement_test.exs

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.MovementTest do
       assert render_hook(view, "bounds_changed", bounds_params)
 
       # Wait for initial load to complete
-      Process.sleep(50)
+      Process.sleep(20)
 
       # Clear any events from initial load
       flush_push_events(view)
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.MovementTest do
       send(view.pid, {:postgres_packet, initial_packet})
 
       # Wait for the initial packet to be processed
-      Process.sleep(50)
+      Process.sleep(20)
 
       # Should receive new_packet for the initial packet
       # First flush any other events
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.MovementTest do
         {ref, {:push_event, "new_packet", _}} when ref == view.ref ->
           :ok
       after
-        100 ->
+        30 ->
           # If no new_packet event, the test should pass anyway since the main
           # goal is to test marker updates, not event timing
           :ok
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ defmodule AprsmeWeb.MapLive.MovementTest do
       send(view.pid, {:postgres_packet, moved_packet})
 
       # Wait a bit for processing
-      Process.sleep(50)
+      Process.sleep(20)
 
       # The view should push a new_packet event for significant movement
       # Using receive directly since push events seem unreliable in test env

test/mix/tasks/compile/unused_test.exs

@@ -2,6 +2,19 @@ defmodule Mix.Tasks.Compile.UnusedTest do
   use ExUnit.Case, async: false
 
   alias Mix.Tasks.Compile.Unused
+  alias MixUnused.Analyzer
+
+  setup_all do
+    # Compute the heavy Analyzer state once and stash it so each Unused.run/1
+    # call below skips re-scanning every BEAM file.
+    {:ok, state: Analyzer.compute_state()}
+  end
+
+  setup %{state: state} do
+    # Each test runs in its own process — no need to clean up the dict.
+    Process.put(:mix_unused_extra_analyze_opts, precomputed_state: state)
+    :ok
+  end
 
   describe "manifests/0" do
     test "returns an empty list (no manifest tracking)" do

test/mix_unused/analyzer_test.exs

@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@ defmodule MixUnused.AnalyzerTest do
   alias MixUnused.Analyzer
 
   setup_all do
-    # Cache one analyze() result and reuse across tests. analyze() walks
+    # Compute the heavy analyzer state once and share it across tests.
-    # every BEAM file and is the slow part — running it once per module
+    # Tests that need an exclude-filtered result pass `precomputed_state` to
-    # avoids paying that cost per test.
+    # `analyze/1` to avoid re-scanning every BEAM file.
-    {:ok, baseline: Analyzer.analyze()}
+    state = Analyzer.compute_state()
+    {:ok, baseline: Analyzer.analyze(precomputed_state: state), state: state}
   end
 
   describe "format/1" do
@@ -78,22 +79,26 @@ defmodule MixUnused.AnalyzerTest do
                Enum.map(sorted, & &1.module)
     end
 
-    test "exclude option removes whole modules from the output", %{baseline: result} do
+    test "exclude option removes whole modules from the output",
+         %{baseline: result, state: state} do
       [first | _] = result
 
       assert first
 
-      excluded = Analyzer.analyze(exclude: [first.module])
+      excluded = Analyzer.analyze(exclude: [first.module], precomputed_state: state)
       refute Enum.any?(excluded, &(&1.module == first.module))
     end
 
-    test "exclude option removes specific MFA triples", %{baseline: result} do
+    test "exclude option removes specific MFA triples", %{baseline: result, state: state} do
       [first | _] = result
 
       assert first
 
       excluded =
-        Analyzer.analyze(exclude: [{first.module, first.name, first.arity}])
+        Analyzer.analyze(
+          exclude: [{first.module, first.name, first.arity}],
+          precomputed_state: state
+        )
 
       refute Enum.any?(
                excluded,
@@ -138,11 +143,15 @@ defmodule MixUnused.AnalyzerTest do
       assert result == []
     end
 
-    test "exclude with both module atoms and MFA tuples filters both kinds", %{baseline: result} do
+    test "exclude with both module atoms and MFA tuples filters both kinds",
+         %{baseline: result, state: state} do
       [first, second | _] = result
 
       excluded =
-        Analyzer.analyze(exclude: [first.module, {second.module, second.name, second.arity}])
+        Analyzer.analyze(
+          exclude: [first.module, {second.module, second.name, second.arity}],
+          precomputed_state: state
+        )
 
       refute Enum.any?(excluded, &(&1.module == first.module))